Financing Yekaterinburg EXPO Jeopardizes State Enterprise’s Property, Prosecution Authorities Claim
Sverdlovsk Region public prosecution authorities completed their check of whether the credit instruments of Ural Exhibition Center had been secured in a legitimate way; now the Center is the investor in the construction of Yekaterinburg EXPO, an international exhibition center, at the expense of Sverdlovskaya poultry factory, a state-run enterprise.
It has been determined that the finances for the international exhibition center Yekaterinburg EXPO came from both Ural Exhibition Center’s own funds and the borrowed ones (provided through a loan from Sberbank). The loan payoff was backed up by a guarantee from Sverdlovskaya poultry factory, to which Sverdlovsk Region Ministry for State Property Management had agreed earlier. Therefore in case Sberbank did not get its loan back, the money could be obtained from the guarantor, the factory.
The law allows state-run unitary enterprises to act as guarantors only when this is in compliance with the enterprise’s charter purposes and is stated in the charter. The charter of Sverdlovskaya poultry factory does not state the possibility of such transactions. Thus the Ministry for State Property Management gave its agreement to the guarantor’s contract illegitimately,’ the prosecution authorities claim.
It has been determined that the finances for the international exhibition center Yekaterinburg EXPO came from both Ural Exhibition Center’s own funds and the borrowed ones (provided through a loan from Sberbank). The loan payoff was backed up by a guarantee from Sverdlovskaya poultry factory, to which Sverdlovsk Region Ministry for State Property Management had agreed earlier. Therefore in case Sberbank did not get its loan back, the money could be obtained from the guarantor, the factory.
The law allows state-run unitary enterprises to act as guarantors only when this is in compliance with the enterprise’s charter purposes and is stated in the charter. The charter of Sverdlovskaya poultry factory does not state the possibility of such transactions. Thus the Ministry for State Property Management gave its agreement to the guarantor’s contract illegitimately,’ the prosecution authorities claim.
Код для вставки в блог | Подписаться на рассылку | Распечатать |
Другие материалы по теме:
- Yekaterinburg EXPO Loan Must Be Paid by Stockholders, not State, Ministry S ...
- Uralzarubezhservice to merge with InExpo
- Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court Looks Into Iset vs. Ural Exhibition Cen ...
- Sverdlovskaya poultry factory is Yekaterinburg’s top ammonia and hydrogen s ...
- Rusgrad to Lay Two Claims against Ural Exhibition Center