Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court accepted the claim laid by AstanaEnergoPromStroy & Co against Beloyarskaya Nuclear Power Station (US BAES) for processing. The plaintiff insists on being paid 73.98m RUR.

This is actually not the first claim AstanaEnergoPromStroy & Co lays against US BAES. In 2010, the Kazakh company appealed to an arbitration court, hoping to make the defendant provide the plaintiff with the copies of the as-built documentation, namely, acts of work completion, signed by the director and sealed with the company seal. AstanaEnergoPromStroy & Co was involved in the construction of the power station as a sub-contractor. The plaintiff claimed that they completed 158.2m RUR worth of construction jobs in 2008 but the as-built documentation was lost. The BAES representatives then claimed they were not in the possession of any documentation since all the papers were handed over to the customer, the directorate of Beloyarskaya Nuclear Power Station 2 (a subsidiary of Concern RosEnergoAtom).

In their statement of defense, the defendant explained that they were not going to accept the claims, as the current legislation does not make it obligatory for the general contractor to provide the sub-contractor with the as-built documentation.

In the end, Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court ruled in favor of the power station.