Court of Arbitration hears UralTransBank vs. ROSNO
Sverdlovsk Region Court of Arbitration is to consider two complaints (А60-3012/08 and А60-3039/08) filed by UralTransBank against ROSNO on March 28, 2008. Both cases are related to insurance payments.
‘As for the first suit (А60-3012/08), UralTransBank demands for 68,235.54 RUR in compensation, as for the second one (А60-3039/08), the bank wants to get 142,000 RUR. Even though the sums are not overwhelming, the thing is, the bank has already laid more than 200 claims against the insurer, so the total sum comes to a very tidy bit. I believe these two cases will be the main points on today’s meeting’s agenda, though cases А60-2048/08, А60-2142/08, and А60-2131/08 will be considered as well,’ the spokesperson for Sverdlovsk Region Court of Arbitration Yulia Kolyasnikova said to UrBC.
The two parties’ argument began as early as 2006.
UralTransBank, having insured its financial risks related to bad debt on consumer loans with ROSNO, claims they haven’t been fully compensated for the insured events they had because the insurer only paid them 20.3 million RUR instead of 60 million RUR, while ROSNO accuses the bank of failing to provide all the documents needed to class the contested incidents as insured events.
‘As for the first suit (А60-3012/08), UralTransBank demands for 68,235.54 RUR in compensation, as for the second one (А60-3039/08), the bank wants to get 142,000 RUR. Even though the sums are not overwhelming, the thing is, the bank has already laid more than 200 claims against the insurer, so the total sum comes to a very tidy bit. I believe these two cases will be the main points on today’s meeting’s agenda, though cases А60-2048/08, А60-2142/08, and А60-2131/08 will be considered as well,’ the spokesperson for Sverdlovsk Region Court of Arbitration Yulia Kolyasnikova said to UrBC.
The two parties’ argument began as early as 2006.
UralTransBank, having insured its financial risks related to bad debt on consumer loans with ROSNO, claims they haven’t been fully compensated for the insured events they had because the insurer only paid them 20.3 million RUR instead of 60 million RUR, while ROSNO accuses the bank of failing to provide all the documents needed to class the contested incidents as insured events.
Код для вставки в блог | Подписаться на рассылку | Распечатать |
Другие материалы по теме:
- ROSNO pays UralTransBank based on master agreement, Alexander Cheryarin rep ...
- UralTransBank exerts pressure on us through civic bodies, claims ROSNO Insu ...
- UralTransBank and ROSNO to re-consider insurance claims but might still app ...
- Dispute between ROSNO and UralTransBank keeps unwinding
- UralTransBank responds to ROSNO’s independent examination