Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court to hear Radio Equipment Plant vs. Bank Inteza

The 17th Arbitration & Appeals Court rejected the claim of KESKO-Ural; the plaintiff actually contested the ruling pronounced by Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court earlier. In July 2011, Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court refused to meet the claims of KESKO-Ural (the Novotel Hotel) laid against Zoom Zoom Photographers; the plaintiff insisted on being paid 223,000 RUR by the defendant. At the start, KESKO-Ural refused to pay Zoom Zoom Photographers their fee for taking a photo shoot of the Yekaterinburg-based Novotel Hotel’s interior. The photography business took the case to an

Egorshinskiy radio plant is to undergo bankruptcy proceedings, Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court ruled on August 17, 2009. This was the court’s verdict on the claim laid by Vodokanal against the plant regarding the defendant’s 2.74-million-ruble debt. The claim was placed with the court on June 17, 2009. In July, Arbitration Court received a petition from Uralkabel; the company insisted on declaring the radio plant insolvent. According to the official data available, the plant then owed over 1.5 billion RUR to its creditors and partners, with about 61 million RUR worth of wage arrears.

Moscow District Federal Arbitration Court postponed the hearing of the writ of appeal placed by IG Holding Ltd (Integra Group) until September 17, 2010. The writ concerns the registration of Uralmash Drilling Equipment trademark, the Russian Agency of Legal and Court Information (RAPSI) reports. The court states that the writ of appeal is not complete without the documents that could prove the payment of the state fees in their due amount or the applicant’s right to get state fees relief. Now IG Holdings Ltd would like the court of cassation to overrule the decision taken by Moscow

Sverdlovsk Region Arbitration Court keeps looking into the claim laid by Apogei Metall Yekaterinburg against Ural Turbine Plant. The plaintiff insists on being paid 2,466,018.54 RUR for the products delivered, the contract penalty of 123,300.93 RUR for the period of August 27, 2008 to December 29, 2008, and the 969,701.2- RUR interest (VAT excluded) for the period of December 30, 2008 till the payoff date. The plaintiff took the case to court hoping the authorities would secure the claim by arresting the defendant’s cash assets, namely, 2,613,766.07 RUR (2,589,319.47 RUR which is the claim’s

The preliminary sitting of Chelyabinsk Region Court of Arbitration concerning the claim laid by Starwood Trading Ltd. against Metallurgical Works of Zlatoust JSC (currently managed by ESTAR) took place yesterday. The plaintiff demanded that the defendant pay 18.5m RUR in compensation for the faulty produce previously supplied by the latter. As the spokesperson for Sovetnik Ltd., the legal representative of the plaintiff, said to UrBC representative, the court sitting was aimed at letting the two parties present their cases. The defendants tried appealing against the claim, yet, in the